Egalitarianism
/ee-GAL-ih-TAIR-ee-un-ism/
noun
From French égalitaire, from égal — "equal," from Latin aequalis (equal). In general usage, the belief that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities. In theological usage, the position that men and women hold identical roles in marriage and church leadership, with no distinction of authority or function based on sex. The opposing position is complementarianism — the view that men and women are equal in value but distinct in role — though MOOP distinguishes complementarianism (the 1987 CBMW halfway position) from patriarchal headship (the historic biblical standard), which is the position MOOP holds.

📖 Biblical Definition

Scripture teaches the equal dignity of men and women before God. Both are made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). Both are heirs of the grace of life (1 Peter 3:7). In Christ, there is neither male nor female in terms of salvation and standing before God (Galatians 3:28).

But equal dignity does not mean identical function. Scripture consistently distinguishes the roles of men and women in marriage and in the church. The husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church (Ephesians 5:23). Women are not to exercise authority over men in the teaching office of the church (1 Timothy 2:12). Elders and overseers are to be men (1 Timothy 3:1-2; Titus 1:6). These are not cultural artifacts but grounded in the creation order: Paul roots his argument in Adam being formed first, and then Eve (1 Timothy 2:13).

The biblical model is equality of worth with distinction of role — exactly the pattern within the Trinity itself, where the Son is equal to the Father in nature yet submits to the Father's authority (1 Corinthians 11:3; John 6:38). Subordination in role does not imply inferiority in nature. If it did, then Christ would be inferior to the Father — a heresy the church rejected at Nicaea.

📜 Webster 1828 Definition

This theological usage did not exist in 1828.

expand to see more

Webster 1828 does not contain "egalitarianism." The word entered English from the French Revolution's ideology of radical equality. Its application to gender roles in the church is a 20th-century development, arising primarily from second-wave feminism's influence on mainline Protestant theology in the 1960s and 1970s, and entering evangelical debate through organizations like Christians for Biblical Equality (founded 1988).

📖 Key Scripture

1 Timothy 2:12-13 — "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve."

Ephesians 5:22-25 — "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord... Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church."

Galatians 3:28 — "There is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

1 Corinthians 11:3 — "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God."

⚠️ Modern Corruption

Egalitarianism smuggles feminism into the church wearing biblical language.

expand to see more

Theological egalitarianism is feminism baptized. It takes the cultural assumption that any role distinction between men and women is inherently oppressive and forces Scripture to comply. The method is always the same: take clear, didactic passages (1 Timothy 2, 1 Corinthians 11, 1 Corinthians 14, Ephesians 5) and neutralize them by claiming they are "culturally conditioned," "addressed to a specific situation," or "mistranslated" — while elevating Galatians 3:28 (a soteriological statement about salvation, not a statement about church polity) into the controlling hermeneutical lens for the entire Bible.

The trajectory is instructive. Every denomination that has embraced egalitarianism has subsequently embraced the normalization of homosexuality within one to two generations. This is not coincidence. Once you establish the principle that clear biblical role distinctions can be overridden by cultural sensibilities, you have created a hermeneutical engine that will eventually override every biblical sexual ethic. The logic is identical: "Paul was writing to his culture, not to ours."

The deepest corruption is the claim that biblical patriarchy and male headship degrade women. They do not. Scripture's vision honors women under Christlike leadership that sacrifices for them, assigning them a role so essential that the family and the church cannot function without it — while protecting them from the crushing weight of authority they were never designed to bear alone.

Usage

• "Egalitarianism confuses equality of worth with identity of function. The Son is equal to the Father but submits to Him — is the Son degraded?"

• "Every denomination that ordains women eventually affirms homosexuality. The hermeneutic that nullifies 1 Timothy 2 will eventually nullify Romans 1."

• "Paul did not ground male headship in Corinthian culture. He grounded it in creation — Adam was formed first, then Eve. You cannot culturally relativize the garden of Eden."

Related Words