Mid-to-late twentieth-century dispensationalist-evangelical theological movement representing the institutional articulation of the easy-believism position. The movement holds that saving faith requires only intellectual assent to the gospel proposition (typically formulated as Christ died for sinners and I trust Him for my eternal life) without the corresponding response of repentance from sin, submission to Christ's lordship, or commitment to obedient discipleship. Principal architects: Lewis Sperry Chafer (founder of Dallas Theological Seminary), Charles Ryrie (Chafer's successor), Zane Hodges (Dallas Seminary professor and prolific Free-Grace writer), Bob Wilkin (founder of the Grace Evangelical Society). The Free Grace position is the institutional opposite of the Reformed-confessional Lordship-Salvation position articulated by John MacArthur, R. C. Sproul, and the broader confessional Reformed world. The Free-Grace argument is exegetically thin: it relies heavily on a particular reading of Pauline justification-by-faith-alone passages while bypassing the Synoptic and Johannine teaching on discipleship (Luke 14:25-33; John 8:31), the Pauline teaching on the necessary fruit of saving faith (Romans 6; Galatians 5:19-25; Ephesians 2:10), James 2:14-26, and the entire NT pattern of repentance-and-faith-as-integrated response. The Reformed-confessional rejection of Free-Grace is unambiguous (the Westminster Confession of Faith, the Heidelberg Catechism, and the Canons of Dort all integrate saving faith with repentance, perseverance, and obedient sanctification). The patriarchal-Reformed reader stands with the historic Reformed-confessional position against the Free-Grace innovation.
Mid-late 20th-c. dispensationalist-evangelical movement institutionalizing easy-believism; Chafer, Ryrie, Hodges, Wilkin; opposed by Reformed-confessional Lordship Salvation; rejected by historic Reformed confessions.
FREE GRACE MOVEMENT, n. (contemporary theological movement; mid-late 20th c.) Dispensationalist-evangelical movement holding that saving faith requires only intellectual assent to the gospel proposition without repentance, lordship-submission, or obedient discipleship. Institutional architects: Lewis Sperry Chafer (founder, Dallas Theological Seminary); Charles Ryrie; Zane Hodges; Bob Wilkin (Grace Evangelical Society). Opposed by Reformed-confessional Lordship Salvation (MacArthur, Sproul, broader Reformed world). Exegetically thin: relies on Pauline justification passages while bypassing Synoptic, Johannine, Pauline-imperative, and Jacobean teaching. Rejected by Westminster Confession, Heidelberg Catechism, Canons of Dort — all of which integrate saving faith with repentance, perseverance, and obedient sanctification.
Luke 14:25-27 — "And there went great multitudes with him: and he turned, and said unto them, If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple."
Romans 6:1-2 — "What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?"
Galatians 5:24 — "And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts."
Ephesians 2:10 — "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."
Free Grace Movement institutionalizes easy-believism; reduces saving faith to intellectual assent; rejected by historic Reformed confessions and Lordship-Salvation movement.
The Free Grace Movement is the institutional articulation of the easy-believism position. Its core claim is that saving faith requires only intellectual assent to the gospel proposition without repentance, lordship-submission, or obedient discipleship. The historic Reformed confessions all reject this position. The Westminster Confession of Faith XIV.2 articulates saving faith as not only assents to the truth of the promise of the gospel; and acts differently upon that which each particular passage thereof containeth; yielding obedience to the commands, trembling at the threatenings, and embracing the promises of God for this life, and that which is to come. The Westminster Larger Catechism Q. 72 defines justifying faith as a saving grace that not only assenteth to the truth of the promise of the gospel, but receiveth and resteth upon Christ and his righteousness — receiving Christ in His whole office, including His lordship.
The patriarchal-Reformed reader stands with the historic Reformed confessions against the Free-Grace innovation. The position is theologically dangerous: it produces vast numbers of nominal Christians whose prayed-the-sinner's-prayer profession is divorced from any substantive evidence of regeneration; it severs justification from sanctification in a way the NT and the confessions explicitly reject; it provides false assurance to the unrepentant; and it weakens the church's discipline by treating bare profession as a sufficient marker of genuine faith. The patriarchal-Reformed answer is the integrated biblical-confessional gospel: justified by faith alone in Christ alone, the same faith never alone but always issuing in repentance, obedient discipleship, and perseverance.
Dallas Seminary lineage; Chafer, Ryrie, Hodges; Grace Evangelical Society; institutional easy-believism; rejected by Reformed confessions.
['English (theological)', '—', 'free grace', 'doctrinally weighted term claiming priority of grace']
['English', '—', 'Dallas Theological Seminary', 'institutional home of dispensationalist Free Grace tradition']
['English', '—', 'Grace Evangelical Society', "Bob Wilkin's continuing organizational expression"]
"Free Grace Movement: institutional easy-believism in dispensationalist-evangelical orbit."
"Chafer, Ryrie, Hodges, Wilkin as institutional architects."
"Rejected by Reformed-confessional Lordship Salvation and historic confessions."