Hyperpreterism, also called full or consistent preterism, is the heretical view that every biblical prophecy—including the second coming of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, and the last judgment—was entirely fulfilled in the first century, chiefly in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, so that nothing whatever remains future for the church. Whereas partial preterism rightly locates the judgment-coming upon Jerusalem in A.D. 70 while keeping the bodily second coming, resurrection, and judgment genuinely future, hyperpreterism presses the time-texts past all limit and collapses the entire eschatological hope into the past. The consequences are fatal to the faith. It denies a future, bodily, visible return of Christ, contradicting the angels’ promise that “this same Jesus… shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go.” It denies a future bodily resurrection of believers, reinterpreting it as a spiritual event already accomplished—the precise error of Hymenaeus and Philetus, who said the resurrection was past already and thereby overthrew the faith of some, and whom Paul names as men whose word eats like a canker. It empties the creeds, which confess that Christ “shall come again to judge the quick and the dead” and looks for “the resurrection of the body and the life everlasting.” For these reasons the church across its branches has judged hyperpreterism to be outside the bounds of orthodoxy—not a tolerable variant of preterism but a denial of the blessed hope.
Webster 1828 has no entry for this modern term; it is the full form of preterism, which Webster’s root PRETERIT (past) describes, pressed to deny any future fulfillment.
PRETERIT, a. — Past; gone by; perfectly finished.
“Hyperpreterism” (full or consistent preterism) is a recent coinage for the view that all prophecy, including the resurrection and second coming, was already fulfilled in A.D. 70—a position the church judges heretical.
2 Timothy 2:17-18 — "And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some."
Acts 1:11 — "...this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven."
1 Corinthians 15:13 — "But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen."
1 Thessalonians 4:16 — "For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first."
Hyperpreterism is itself the error—a heresy, distinguished from orthodox partial preterism precisely by its denial of a future bodily resurrection and visible return of Christ.
Hyperpreterism is not a school of interpretation within orthodoxy but a departure from it, and the line that divides it from the legitimate partial preterism is bright and decisive. Partial preterism honors the time-texts by placing the judgment-coming upon Jerusalem in A.D. 70, yet holds fast to a future, bodily, visible return of Christ, a future general resurrection, and a future last judgment—the very articles the creeds confess. Hyperpreterism, by contrast, presses “this generation” and “shortly” until they swallow the whole of prophecy, declaring that the second coming, the resurrection, and the judgment all happened in the first century and that nothing remains for the church to await.
This is precisely the error the apostle condemned. Hymenaeus and Philetus said “that the resurrection is past already,” and Paul declared that they had erred concerning the truth and overthrown the faith of some, their word spreading like gangrene. Hyperpreterism revives their teaching wholesale: it leaves the believer with no future hope of bodily resurrection, no visible return of his Lord, and a creed emptied of its forward-looking articles. The church catholic—Reformed, Lutheran, Anglican, Roman, and Orthodox alike—has judged it heresy. One may hold partial preterism in good conscience and full communion; one cannot hold hyperpreterism and the faith of the creeds together.
The error is marked by huper (beyond)—preterism pushed past its limit—and revives the heresy that the anastasis (resurrection) “is past already” (2 Tim 2:18).
"Hyperpreterism denies a future resurrection and return of Christ—the very error Paul condemned in Hymenaeus."
"The line between partial preterism and hyperpreterism is the line between an interpretive school and a heresy."
"Full preterism empties the creed of “he shall come again” and “the resurrection of the body.”"