📖 Biblical Definition
The Sanhedrin was the highest Jewish court, composed of 71 members including the high priest, chief priests, elders, and scribes. It exercised authority over religious, civil, and criminal matters within the limits permitted by Rome. The Sanhedrin tried Jesus: "And the chief priests and all the council sought for witness against Jesus to put him to death" (Mark 14:55). It later persecuted the apostles: "And when they had brought them, they set them before the council" (Acts 5:27). Paul himself appeared before the Sanhedrin (Acts 23:1). Notable members included Nicodemus (John 3:1), Joseph of Arimathea (Mark 15:43), and Gamaliel (Acts 5:34).
📜 Webster 1828 Definition
The great council of the Jewish nation.
expand to see more
SANHEDRIN, n. The great council of the Jewish nation, consisting of seventy elders, to which the high priest was added as president. This council had the chief authority in the state, both in civil and religious affairs. Webster understood the Sanhedrin as the supreme governing body of the Jewish people, exercising both civil and religious jurisdiction.
📖 Key Scripture
• Mark 14:55 — "And the chief priests and all the council sought for witness against Jesus to put Him to death."
• Acts 5:27-29 — "They set them before the council... Then Peter and the other apostles answered, We ought to obey God rather than men."
• Acts 23:1-6 — "And Paul, earnestly beholding the council, said, Men and brethren, I have lived in all good conscience before God."
• John 3:1 — "There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews."
⚠️ Modern Corruption
The Sanhedrin's role in Christ's trial is either exploited for antisemitism or whitewashed entirely.
expand to see more
The Sanhedrin's condemnation of Christ has been misused throughout history to fuel antisemitic hatred, blaming all Jews for the actions of a corrupt religious leadership. Scripture is clear: Christ was delivered up by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God (Acts 2:23), and it was the sins of all humanity -- not one ethnic group -- that nailed Him to the cross. Conversely, modern revisionism attempts to exonerate the Sanhedrin entirely, claiming the trial narratives are later Christian inventions designed to shift blame from Rome to Jews. Both approaches distort the text. The Sanhedrin's corruption was real -- they violated their own procedures in condemning Jesus -- but this indicts religious hypocrisy and institutional power, not an entire people.
Usage
• "The Sanhedrin's trial of Jesus violated their own rules -- no capital trial at night, no conviction without two witnesses, no same-day sentencing -- yet God used their lawlessness to accomplish His sovereign purpose."
• "When the apostles stood before the Sanhedrin and declared 'we ought to obey God rather than men,' they established the principle that no human authority can override divine command."