See also: Theodicy
Theodicy is the attempt to vindicate the justice, goodness, and power of God in the face of the existence of evil and suffering—to answer the ancient problem that if God is wholly good He would prevent evil, and if wholly powerful He could, yet evil exists. The term was coined by Leibniz, but the question is as old as Job. Scripture does not approach the matter as if God were a defendant in the dock of human reason; rather, it humbles the questioner and supplies the materials for a faithful answer. It affirms without flinching that God is absolutely sovereign—He works all things after the counsel of His will, and evil does not escape His decree—and at the same time absolutely holy—He is not the author of sin, cannot be tempted with evil, and is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity. It locates the origin of moral evil in the free, culpable rebellion of creatures, angelic and human, not in God. It teaches that God permits evil for wise and good ends He does not always disclose, overruling it for greater good—the supreme instance being the cross, the worst evil ever committed, ordained for the greatest good ever accomplished. It points to the final judgment, when every wrong will be righted and God’s justice fully vindicated, and to the new creation, where evil is abolished forever. And it answers the suffering saint not chiefly with a syllogism but with a Person: God Himself, in Christ, entered the world’s suffering and bore its evil. The biblical theodicy thus refuses both the denial of God’s sovereignty (to spare His goodness) and the denial of His goodness (to preserve His power), holding that the Judge of all the earth shall do right, even where His ways are past finding out.
Webster 1828 has no entry for “theodicy” (a recent coinage); it defines THEOLOGY and treats the JUSTICE of God, the subject the term concerns.
“Theodicy” is a modern term, coined by Leibniz, from the Greek theos (God) and dikē (justice): the vindication of the divine justice and goodness in permitting the existence of evil.
JUSTICE, n. — ...The justice of God is the perfection by which he is infinitely righteous in himself and in all his dealings with his creatures.
Genesis 18:25 — "...Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?"
Romans 9:20 — "Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?"
Genesis 50:20 — "But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good... to save much people alive."
Romans 8:28 — "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose."
Theodicy is corrupted by every “solution” that rescues God’s goodness by sacrificing His sovereignty—the finite God, the God who cannot prevent evil, the open future—and by the atheist who makes evil a proof there is no God.
The most common corruption of theodicy in the modern age is the rescue of God’s goodness at the price of His sovereignty and power. Recoiling from the thought that a sovereign God could ordain a world containing evil, theologians have proposed a God who is finite, limited, or self-restricted—a God who would prevent suffering if He could but cannot, who does His best against forces He does not control, who leaves the future genuinely open because even He cannot know or govern free choices. This may seem to acquit God of evil, but it does so by dethroning Him: a God who cannot prevent evil is no comfort to the sufferer, for he is left to wonder whether such a God can finally triumph at all, or wipe away the last tear. A defeated or limited God solves the logical problem only by abolishing the object of worship.
The atheist presses the same problem to the opposite conclusion: evil exists, therefore the good and powerful God of Scripture does not. But this argument quietly borrows a standard of “evil” that only a moral Creator can supply, and so saws off the branch it sits on. The biblical theodicy refuses both errors. It will not surrender God’s sovereignty to spare His goodness, nor His goodness to preserve His power; it confesses both, holding that God ordains and overrules evil for ends wise and good, that the guilt of evil rests on the creature, that the cross turns the worst evil to the greatest good, and that the final judgment will vindicate His justice fully. It answers the sufferer not with a tidy formula but with the crucified and risen Christ, and with the confidence that the Judge of all the earth shall do right—even where, for now, His ways are past finding out.
The term joins theos (God) and dikē (justice); the biblical answer rests that the Judge (shaphat) of all the earth shall do right.
"A biblical theodicy refuses to rescue God’s goodness by surrendering His sovereignty, or His power by denying His goodness."
"The cross is the heart of theodicy—the worst evil ever done, ordained for the greatest good ever accomplished."
"Scripture answers the problem of evil not with a tidy formula but with ‘shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?’"