See also: Exclusive Psalmody
Definition · Webster 1828 · Scriptures · Corruption · Roots · Usage · Related
Exclusive psalmody is the view, held by a portion of the Reformed and Presbyterian tradition, that only the inspired songs of Scripture—chiefly the book of Psalms—are to be sung in the public worship of God, to the exclusion of uninspired hymns composed by men. It is an application of the regulative principle of worship, which holds that only what God has commanded or warranted in His Word may be included in worship. The exclusive psalmodist reasons thus: God has given His church an inspired book of praise, the Psalter, perfectly suited for worship and bearing His own authority; He has commanded the singing of psalms; and since worship is to be regulated by His Word, the church has no warrant to introduce into the solemn worship of God the uninspired compositions of men, however edifying, any more than she may add uninspired prayers claiming the authority of Scripture or uninspired readings alongside the Word. The psalms, moreover, are Christ-centered (He is found throughout them), comprehensive (covering every spiritual need and emotion), and divinely guaranteed to be acceptable praise. Exclusive psalmody has been the conviction of bodies such as the Reformed Presbyterian churches and was widely held among the Scottish Presbyterians and Puritans. It is distinguished from the broader Reformed view, which holds that while the psalms have a primary and honored place, the church may also sing biblically faithful hymns, appealing to the ‘hymns and spiritual songs’ named alongside psalms in Paul’s exhortations, to the new songs sung in Scripture, and to the church’s liberty to praise God in faithful uninspired song as she prays in uninspired words. The debate, conducted among brethren who agree on the regulative principle and the centrality of the psalms, turns on whether ‘hymns and spiritual songs’ denote inspired psalms or warrant uninspired composition, and whether the regulative principle excludes uninspired song from worship. It is an intramural question of worship, to be handled with the seriousness it deserves and the charity that brethren owe one another.
Webster 1828 has no entry for this term; it concerns whether worship-song is restricted to the inspired PSALMS, an application of the regulative principle.
EXCLUSIVE, a. — ...Having the power of preventing entrance; debarring from participation; shutting out.
“Exclusive psalmody” is the doctrine that the inspired psalms alone are to be sung in public worship, excluding uninspired hymns.
Colossians 3:16 — "...teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord."
Ephesians 5:19 — "Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs..."
James 5:13 — "Is any among you afflicted? let him pray. Is any merry? let him sing psalms."
1 Chronicles 16:9 — "Sing unto him, sing psalms unto him, talk ye of all his wondrous works."
This is an intramural Reformed debate over the regulative principle. The dangers are a rigid sectarianism that unchurches those who sing hymns, and (on the other side) the abandonment of the psalms altogether for shallow modern song.
Exclusive psalmody is a serious and principled position within the Reformed family, resting on the regulative principle of worship and a high regard for the inspired Psalter, and held by godly churches and theologians. Its argument deserves respect: God gave His church an inspired songbook bearing His own authority, commanded the singing of psalms, and (the exclusive psalmodist holds) gave no warrant to introduce uninspired human compositions into His solemn worship. The debate with the broader Reformed view—which sings psalms and faithful hymns alike—turns on the meaning of ‘hymns and spiritual songs’ and the scope of the regulative principle, and is conducted among brethren who agree on far more than divides them. It is an intramural question of worship, not a contest between faith and unbelief.
The dangers attaching to the debate lie at both extremes. On the exclusive side, the position can harden into a rigid sectarianism that unchurches or despises fellow believers who sing biblically faithful hymns, treating a disputed application of the regulative principle as though it were a clear command of God and breaking fellowship over it. On the other side, the broader churches, having admitted hymns, have too often abandoned the psalms altogether—the inspired songbook of the church for three thousand years now scarcely sung in many congregations—and filled their worship instead with shallow, man-centered, doctrinally thin modern songs, losing the rich, Christ-centered, comprehensive praise of the Psalter. Both errors are to be avoided. The exclusive psalmodist should hold his conviction with charity toward brethren; and every church, whatever its view of uninspired hymns, should recover the central and honored place of the inspired psalms in her worship, that the church may sing again the songbook God Himself gave her.
The view applies the regulative principle to song, holding that only inspired psalmoi (psalms) bear divine warrant for worship—the disputed words being hymnoi (hymns) and ōidai (songs).
"Exclusive psalmody holds that only the inspired psalms are to be sung in worship, applying the regulative principle to song."
"The debate turns on whether ‘hymns and spiritual songs’ denote inspired psalms or warrant uninspired composition."
"Its danger is a sectarianism that unchurches hymn-singers; the broader churches’ danger is abandoning the psalms altogether."